A Snapshot of the Walla Walla Economy

A review of local housing data, short-term rentals, and wages indicates a mismatch between the cost of living in the community and the incomes of the workers who support its essential services and economy.

The current housing market is dominated by mid- to high-priced homes. Of approximately 164 homes listed for sale, only 17 are priced under $350,000, and five of those are under 1,000 square feet. The majority of listings fall between $351,000 and $800,000, with additional properties priced above $1 million. This pricing structure places homeownership beyond reach for many local workers.

Local wage data illustrates the affordability gap. Many government, healthcare support, and service-sector jobs earn between approximately $40,000 and $65,000 annually. Even higher-paid roles, including corrections officers, construction workers, and licensed practical nurses, often struggle to afford homes at current market prices without dual incomes or external financial support.

At the same time, the community has a substantial number of short-term rental properties, with over 280 listings on VRBO and more than 330 on Airbnb. Even accounting for overlap and owner-occupied units, hundreds of homes have been removed from the long-term housing supply. This reduces availability for residents, increases competition for remaining homes, and contributes to higher purchase prices and rents.

In summary, the data suggests the issue is driven by a structural imbalance: housing costs reflect demand from visitors and higher-income newcomers, while local wages have not kept pace.  Walla Walla is quickly sliding into a resort economy. The fixes are painful and politically unpopular.

As a result, the community increasingly attracts residents with outside wealth, retirement income, or remote employment, while workers who rely on local wages face limited housing options. This dynamic contributes to the loss of working-age residents, difficulty filling essential jobs, an aging population, and reduced long-term community stability.


Changes in the local grocery market illustrate the effects of housing unaffordability. A long-established, locally owned grocery store recently closed after a period of declining customers and rising prices. As the customer base shrank, prices were increased to offset lower volume, which further reduced patronage and accelerated closure. This pattern is consistent with the loss of stable, middle-income, year-round households that form the backbone of a community.

At the same time, the local grocery landscape is undergoing significant realignment. Discount-oriented retailers such as Walmart, WinCo, and dollar stores selling groceries serve cost-constrained residents whose housing expenses consume a growing share of household income. Concurrently, existing grocery chains are renovating and repositioning toward more upscale offerings, and a Natural Grocers is under construction in the downtown area (ironically, the Manager job at Natural Grocers pays $80k/yr). These stores primarily target higher-income residents, retirees, remote workers, and part-time or second-home owners whose purchasing power is less constrained by local wage levels.

A locally owned grocery serving a specific religious community remains viable, reflecting demographic concentration and strong internal demand within a portion of the population rather than broad-based community stability. Short-term visitors and part-time residents contribute to economic activity but do not generate the consistent, high-volume grocery demand required to sustain mid-priced, community-oriented stores.

This increasing polarization of grocery options mirrors trends in the housing market. As workforce housing becomes scarcer, the population divides between households under growing financial pressure and those insulated from housing cost increases. The loss of mid-market retail options reduces everyday convenience and affordability for working families, further diminishing the feasibility of long-term residency.

Together, these retail shifts reinforce the broader conclusion that housing affordability challenges are reshaping not only who can live in the community, but how the local economy functions. The erosion of stable, full-time residency weakens essential services, local businesses, and long-term fiscal sustainability.


Milton Freewater has become a sort of relief valve for Walla Walla/College Place. It is a relocation option for whom staying in the area is desired or a  necessity. The fact that Milton Freewater offers limited local services, largely restricted to a small Safeway grocery and a dollar store, underscores that relocation to this area is not driven by preference or quality of life, but by constrained housing choices in Walla Walla.

For displaced households, this means longer travel times not only for work, but also for routine needs such as groceries and services, increasing transportation costs and time burdens. These additional frictions compound the effects of housing displacement and further reduce opportunities for civic engagement and local spending within the Walla Walla community.

In our current market Milton Freewater enables workforce retention at the regional level while accelerating the erosion of resident stability, participation, and long-term tax capacity.

This is not to blame Milton Freewater, only Walla Walla and College Place can address the root issue and take steps to ensure affordable housing throughout the area.


The first step in stopping the affordability crisis is reigning in short term rentals. End non-owner occupied short term rentals, force those properties into long term rentals or onto the market. This will force a market correction both in rentals and home prices.

Second step is decreasing vacant properties. A vacancy registry for commercial properties should be created, derelict properties require more policing while perpetually vacant but otherwise useable space drags the economy down, the City can help market those spaces.

A vacancy registry for second, non-primary residence homes should be maintained as these properties also require more policing.

New housing developments must include a mix of smaller homes, non-market housing and access to public transportation.


Discover more from Tom Schmerer

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

Leave a Reply

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to provide a more personalized experience and to track your whereabouts around our website in compliance with the European General Data Protection Regulation. If you decide to to opt-out of any future tracking, a cookie will be setup in your browser to remember this choice for one year.

Accept or Deny

Tom Schmerer