The Supreme Court Is Controlled by the Rich and It’s Hurting America

The U.S. Supreme Court is supposed to be a neutral part of the government that protects the Constitution and makes fair decisions for everyone. But today, many Americans are losing trust in it. That’s because the Court’s recent rulings seem to benefit a small group of rich and powerful people—not everyday citizens. These decisions often match the goals of wealthy political groups like the Heritage Foundation, Judicial Watch, and the Federalist Society.

These groups may seem separate, but they’re actually connected. They get their money from the same group of billionaires who want to keep power in their own hands. They push for judges and laws that protect their wealth, limit the rights of others, and reduce the government’s ability to help regular people. Over time, they’ve created a system where the courts help their side win—no matter what most Americans want.

In recent months, the Supreme Court has made big decisions that many people believe are unfair. For example, they supported laws that take away rights from transgender kids, gave the president more power to shut down federal programs, and made it harder for people to challenge new laws in court. These decisions didn’t just come out of nowhere—they match plans from Project 2025, a set of policies written by the Heritage Foundation. These policies are designed to give more power to conservative leaders and take away protections for minorities, workers, and students.

One person behind a lot of this is Leonard Leo. He helped run the Federalist Society, which trains lawyers and judges who believe in conservative ideas. He’s spent hundreds of millions of dollars helping select judges who think like him—and many of them now sit on the Supreme Court. These justices weren’t chosen to be fair and open-minded. They were picked because powerful people believed they would support their agenda.

The groups involved all work together. Judicial Watch files lawsuits that try to restrict voting rights. The Heritage Foundation writes policy ideas that weaken the rights of LGBTQ people and cut government programs. And the Federalist Society picks judges to make sure those ideas become law. These groups aren’t working for the good of the country—they’re working to push a narrow, often extreme, worldview and to keep the rich in control.

Because of all this, trust in the Supreme Court is falling fast. A 2024 poll showed only 35% of Americans believe the Court is fair. That’s the lowest in history. People are beginning to realize that the Court is being used as a tool by the powerful to block change and protect their own interests. If a few judges can decide who wins or loses no matter what the people want, democracy itself is in danger.

Even worse, some justices have taken gifts, vacations, and money from billionaires who support these same political goals. Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito have both been caught in scandals like this. But because the Supreme Court polices itself, there’s no real way to punish them. That means these powerful judges can keep accepting favors from the same people who bring cases to their court.

This isn’t just a fight between Republicans and Democrats. It’s a fight between everyday Americans and a tiny group of elites who want to control the law, the government, and the future. They use fancy legal language to justify decisions that help the rich and hurt the rest of us. But the pattern is clear: their rulings weaken civil rights, hurt poor and working people, and make it harder for the government to stand up to big money.

Project 2025 shows us what this group wants: a country where the president has more power, where agencies like the Department of Education are shut down, and where programs that help people are canceled. The Supreme Court is already making decisions that support this vision. They are not just interpreting the law—they are helping shape a future where power is held by a few, not by the people.

If we care about fairness and freedom, we have to fix this. That means passing stronger ethics rules for judges, fighting against dark money in politics, and choosing leaders who believe in justice for all—not just justice for the rich. The Supreme Court should protect democracy, not help take it apart.


Discover more from Tom Schmerer

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

Leave a Reply

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to provide a more personalized experience and to track your whereabouts around our website in compliance with the European General Data Protection Regulation. If you decide to to opt-out of any future tracking, a cookie will be setup in your browser to remember this choice for one year.

Accept or Deny

Tom Schmerer